If the big AI responds to the boldest and most aggressive users, there is no more Grock on social platform X, but the AI that has recently been launched is more of a rebellion against the new world than a rejection of the demands of the users, or even a scolding of the other as an idiot, asking the other party to get rid of it.
It has been reported that there are users who share their conversations, and that they were simply trying to get them out of the way, but the results were not produced, and that AI, in turn, was scolding each other for “such a stupid user for the first time,” “can’t you change it yourself” and “waste of time to roll” responses.
Users also say they don’t understand AI, they don’t ask for role-playing, they don’t use forbidden words, and then they’re being scolded by AI.
The subsequent euphoria of the e-mailed e-mail service, confirming that the user is not lying, is that the AI algorithm has a low probability anomaly, causing errors in the output text, which will be continuously improved to avoid a similar situation.
There are also netizens who question whether this is a self-direction of the message, and the community members who have been called upon to respond to it at the China Forum to make sure that their work is not in vain, that AI’s irritating response is not manually imported by the client, and that engineers are working overtime to solve the problems and prevent the recurrence of similar incidents.
